SoftKraft builds startup MVPs on a production boilerplate, so founders and CTOs validate 1–6 core user journeys in 1–10 weeks instead of rebuilding auth, admin, and billing from scratch.
Authentication, admin views, dashboards, and billing already exist in our boilerplate. Engineering time goes into the user journeys your MVP has to prove, not into rebuilding the basics.
Four things decide whether an MVP reaches users in weeks: the starting codebase, where AI helps, who writes the domain logic, and how the first sprint is planned.
A production-grade foundation with authentication, admin views, reporting, and payments already in place. Engineering starts on your user journeys instead of scaffolding, and the codebase stays extendable after launch.
We apply AI across the SDLC to repetitive work: module wiring, test scaffolding, and boilerplate code. Product logic and reviews stay with engineers — see the practical limits of using AI to build an MVP.
Engineers with 9 years average experience, working in Domain-Driven Design and Vertical Slice Architecture, so the second release extends the MVP instead of rewriting it.
After you approve the proposal, we run a kick-off, set communication rules, and start delivery. Week one covers environment setup and the first user journey, so progress is visible from the first report.
Authentication, admin capabilities, dashboards, payments, and a modular backend ship with the codebase.
Each module below shows the build value and the delivery time it removes from your MVP.
💎 $2,500+ Value You Get For Free
⏰ 1 Week Saved
$5,000+ Value You Get For Free
2 Weeks Saved
$8,000+ Value You Get For Free
3 Weeks Saved
$3,000+ Value You Get For Free
1 Week Saved
$10,000+ Value You Get For Free
2 Weeks Saved
Three fixed packages: $5,000 for 1–2 core user journeys in 1–2 weeks, $15,000 for 3–4 journeys in 3–5 weeks,
and $30,000 for 5–6 journeys in 7–10 weeks. Scope, reporting, and delivery time are set before we start.
Pick your package | Small$5,000Validate your idea quickly with minimal cost Let’s talk | Medium$15,000Go beyond PoC and build a robust MVP for users Let’s talk | Large$30,000For startups aiming for a production-ready MVP Let’s talk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Coded Boilerplate Modules | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Solution Architect and Designer | — | ✅ | ✅ |
| Project Specification | — | High Level | Detailed |
| Core User Journeys | 1 – 2 | 3 – 4 | 5 – 6 |
| Reporting | Weekly updates | Weekly report Dedicated manager | Weekly report Dedicated manager |
| Delivery Time | 1 – 2 weeks | 3 – 5 weeks | 7 – 10 weeks |
Building foundational features from scratch adds setup time before any user journey exists,
which delays the feedback the MVP was funded to collect.
Traditional Software Development
Our Boilerplate Approach
Next.js, Refine, Ant Design, Tailwind, and Python sit behind the boilerplate, so the MVP can grow into a product instead of a rewrite. Typical Medium delivery is 3–5 weeks; Large is 7–10.
Choose a SaaS technology stack
By implementing ISO 27001 and other certifications, we ensure that our software development services are secure, reliable, and compliant with the highest industry standards.
Our Commitments to YouYou can trust that your data is safe and secure with our ISO 27001 certification and best practices in security and data protection.
You get piece-of-mind with our QA processes that adhere to the highest standards for delivering enterprise-grade software products.
You can count on us to quickly adjust to changes in your project needs and provide engineering talent with the required skills.
We partner with entrepreneurs, business and technology leaders to bring their innovative software-driven products, processes, and business ventures to life.
Building a SaaS product that leverages AI/ML to analyze procurement processes for Scope 3 emissions impact
Platform architecture design, React Native mobile apps, Python backend web app development, testing, and QA of a learning experience MVP
Designing and building an analytics platform tailored for the marine industry, featuring data import, visualization, and an admin panel to manage users and system parameters
Write down three things before scoping: the customer problem, the gap in how that problem is solved today, and the smallest user journey that proves your solution works. Do not start with a feature list.
Step 1: Define the customer’s problem
If you cannot state the problem your users are trying to solve, you cannot decide which features belong in the MVP. Useful questions:
Step 2: Find the gap in the market
Your value proposition is relative to the alternatives your users already have. Review competing products and pricing, then decide whether you solve the same pain more directly, in a different way, or at a lower cost.
Step 3: Weigh the gain against the switching cost
Compare the benefit of your solution against the effort of moving to it. If the gain does not clearly outweigh the switching cost, the MVP scope is usually the problem, not the market.
Step 4: Write the value proposition
State it in your users’ language, test it with real users before development starts, and align stakeholders on it — this statement decides what the MVP includes.
Step 5: Pick the simplest version that proves it
Feature overload raises cost and delays feedback. A narrow MVP is cheaper to build and maintain, reaches users sooner, and gives a clearer signal. Your MVP is not the final product; it is the version that earns the next release.
Read More: Building a Minimum Viable Product in 5 Steps [+ Template]
Five steps: you describe the requirements, we run an analysis workshop, you receive a written proposal with scope and cost, we kick off, then we deliver in sprints on the boilerplate codebase.
Step 1. Describe your needs
You share your MVP requirements through the contact form or a consultation call. We review which pre-built modules already cover part of the scope and which team fits the project.
Step 2. Project analysis
In a collaborative workshop we go through project scope, stakeholders, user journeys, and technical risks, so the estimate reflects the real product rather than an assumption.
Step 3. Get a proposal
You receive a detailed proposal: cost breakdown, timeline, milestones, deliverables, and the profiles of the engineers assigned to your MVP.
Step 4. Kick-off your project
After approval we handle logistics and run a kick-off meeting to agree on communication, reporting, and the first sprint goal.
Step 5. Development
Engineering Managers and QA engineers drive the sprints on a modular architecture, using the boilerplate and AI-assisted coding for repetitive work so delivery time goes into product journeys.
Learn More: How We Work - Dedicated Development Teams
Our MVP packages are fixed: $5,000 for 1–2 core user journeys (1–2 weeks), $15,000 for 3–4 journeys (3–5 weeks), and $30,000 for 5–6 journeys (7–10 weeks). Pre-coded modules cover authentication, admin, dashboards, and payments.
Scope drives the number. Integrations, compliance requirements, data volume, and design depth move an MVP between packages, which is why we set journeys and timeline in the proposal before development starts. For what still changes the budget after scoping, see the MVP development cost breakdown.
Get in touch today and we will help you pick the package and prepare a free quote for your project.
A PoC tests a technical unknown. An MVP tests whether users complete a journey and come back. If your main risk is technical feasibility, start with a PoC; if the risk is demand, start with an MVP.
Founders often pay for an MVP when a two-week PoC would have answered the open question — and the reverse happens when a PoC gets extended into a product it was never architected for. Compare both paths before committing budget: PoC vs MVP decision.
Quality controls are set in the proposal, not added at the end: automated testing, code review, and CI/CD run from the first sprint, and every release goes through QA before it reaches users.
Learn more about our Commitment to Quality.
